Google should not shirk Copyright doors responsibility – Google, tort – Printing Industry

Digital Library Copyright deep crisis of Google, has finally could not stand the pressure of Chinese writers collective action by designating Google Book Search strategy Cooperation Department, Asia Pacific chief Eric? Hartmann China "Firefighting", and to a very "innocent" tone position, Google only provides book summaries, does not provide full preview, this did not violate the Chinese Writers Copyright. All in all, this is "a lack of communication" caused by a misunderstanding. More of them is the Google top the Hai Ba misunderstanding with the Chinese writer shirk the responsibility. Eric? Hartmann said, Google did not mean to writers infringement against China, as Google Book Search is the industry to follow "international convention", which is equally effective in Chinese writers. As for the "international practice" in the end and when formed, how to form, I am sorry, Google can not inform the senior moment.

Clearly, "international custom" one that is difficult to settle their anger felt by Chinese writers, on what basis will not just be a call in advance to play, works covertly to someone else scan the Internet before to send a remedial notice that authors can Google to get in touch, and the right to ask Google removed works, this is not obvious is the King provisions? However, both China and writers how to hate Google's executives still hope to get away again alleges that Google Book part of the preview is Press is authorized, so do not rule out that some authors do not know if publishers have cooperated with Google. Anyway, the whole thing end, Google does not seem a bit of responsibility, it is innocent. Moreover, as far as the Google digital library contains works without permission has been digitized, Google or about 60 U.S. dollars for compensation regarding the Chinese writers, are now more complicated and confusing the. In Google top view, with the court ruling have not you worry what the Chinese writers blind? In other words, Google even the 60 dollar benefits are payable do not want to spend, as Google in the search engine business, consumers can see for free information, why can not I free to crawl information? Here, have to admire Google's wishful thinking played a considerable fine. First, the "fait accompli", anyway, first scan the Internet works, as can be to the royalties of that fee depends on the willingness of authors so much trouble to apply for hundreds of dollars in compensation for that; if the author of the work happens to be dead is even more peace of mind of the. Second, open up profitable way to appear in Google, has similarities with the search engine business, digital libraries can provide books free of charge to Internet users reading, but when built up this huge organization, the business brought its derivative profits will be considerable. For all users, if able, through Network Easily browse the excellent books around the world works, is absolutely good thing. However, as the digital library builder, Google, you should consider better ways to respect and protect the rights of authors, and not blindly obtained free of charge, to shirk responsibility, no matter how high-sounding excuse. I am an expert from atomminipc.com, while we provides the quality product, such as atom embedded pc Manufacturer , low power mini pc, atom d510 mini pc,and more.

Related Articles –
atom embedded pc Manufacturer, low power mini pc,

Email this Article to a Friend!
Receive Articles like this one direct to your email box!Subscribe for free today!