Toxic, harmful, environmental influences threaten human existence. Backyards, parks, and wilderness areas, so inviting and natural, also pose dangers to humans in the form of toxic spider bites or illnesses spread from animals to humans.
In forensic medicine, when causes of morbidity and mortality have to be uncovered, circumstantial
evidence may point to a toxic or infective arthropod bite, and knowledge of the victim’s signs and symptoms and of the suspected culprit determines the course of the investigation.
Patients and doctors alike are known to quickly blame severe ulcers and other consequences of alleged bites on the brown recluse spider; however, incorrect diagnosis and litigation can result from such a presumption (Kunkel, 1985; Vetter, Cushing, Crawford, & Royce, 2003). Yet, warnings against over-diagnosing have led some to under-recognize the spider’s potentially lethal bite, should it actually occur.
Clinically, the causes of skin ulcers are often
unknown and as a consequence, appropriate therapies are delayed (Isbister & Whyte, 2004;
Weenig, Davis, Dahl, & Su, 2002). In assumed
arthropod bites or stings, the dermal and systemic
effects from arachnids and insects of the order hymenoptera (bees, wasps, ants) have to be differentiated. Only a few spider genera inflict
necrotizing lesions (Vetter & Visscher, 1998).
Ticks, also grouped with the arachnids, not only transmit infections, but can secrete toxins of danger to humans. A bite by an Ornithodoros coriaceus (“pajahuelloâ€) of California, a venomous
soft tick, is associated with necrotic lesions resembling those produced by brown spiders, including the brown recluse, genus Loxosceles
(Dooley, 1967; Lewis, 1967; Russell & Waldron,
1967; Vetter & Visscher). Infectious tick bites
can be confused with other arthropod bites before
serological testing is completed. Such confusion
has occurred in cases where Lyme disease is masquerading as a brown recluse (Osterhoudt, Zaoutis, & Zorc, 2002; Rosenstein & Kramer,
1987) or hobo spider bite (Vest, 1993a). Further,
suspected Cheiracanthium spider bites have mimicked African tick-bite fever (Newlands &
Atkinson, 1990).
The skin-tissue damage, which resembles that of a brown recluse spider bite, as well as the systemic effects of being bitten by the hobo spider in the United States, are described below. Note that the spider’s toxicity to humans is not proven (Binford, 2001; Isbister & White, 2004).
The diversity of bite symptoms attributed to this spider (Akre & Myhre, 1991) and the particularly severe systemic reactions (Fisher, Kelly, Krober, Weir, & Jones, 1994; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996; Vest, 1989, 1993b) known worldwide to stem from agelenids, suggest other possible causes, such as tick exposure.
The Myth of Necrotic Arachnidism
The brown recluse spider bite is often erroneously
linked to cases of dying skin tissue, even in geographical areas of the United States where
the spider is not found, which has hindered or
confused diagnostic accuracy (Russell, 1986;Swanson & Vetter, 2005; Vetter, 2000, 2005;
Vetter & Barger, 2002; Vetter & Bush, 2002a,b; Vetter, Cushing, et al., 2003; Vetter, Edwards,
& James, 2004). The hobo spider also falls victim
to false accusations (Bennett & Vetter, 2004;
Vetter, 2000; Vetter & Isbister, 2004; Vetter, Roe, et al., 2003).
Local infections, skin cancers, plant poisoning
(i.e., poison ivy), Lyme disease, tularemia, pyoderma gangrenosum, and other conditions have
been known to masquerade as necrotizing spider
bites (Bennett & Vetter, 2004; Swanson & Vetter, 2005) or as the tick-borne illness Rocky Mountain spotted fever (Erickson, Hryhorezuk, Lipscomb, Burda, & Greenberg, 1990; Vetter, Cushing, et al., 2003).
Necrotic arachnidism, when diagnosed without
substantiated proof of a spider bite and when obscuring other reasonable causes, has been viewed as a modern myth (Isbister, 2004; Kunkel, 1985; Vetter, 2004; Vetter & Bush, 2002a; White, 1999). The alleged skin-tissue death caused by the Brazilian wolf spider (a Lycosa species), the Australian white-tail spider (a Lampona species), and the hobo spider of northwestern Pacific regions provides examples of the myth (Isbister, 2004; Vetter, 2004; Vetter & Bush, 2002a). Verified envenomation case studies have shown that the Brazilian wolf spider (Ribeiro, Jorge, Piesco, & De Andrade Nishioka, 1990) and the white-tail spider (Isbister & Gray, 2003) do not cause necrosis. In alternative medicine, prevailing historical myths about wolf spiders regarding their alleged neurotoxic (Richardson-Boedler, 2001) and severe necrotic effects (Richardson-Boedler, 2002) have been discredited.
For the purposes of clinical descriptions and
the establishment of diagnostic guidelines, only
verified cases of spider bites, when the culprit
species are identified, are acceptable (Anderson,
1991; Bennett & Vetter, 2004; Binford, 2001;
Isbister, 2002; Isbister & White, 2004; Vetter
& Bush, 2002a, b; Vetter & Isbister, 2004).
Documentation, study, and comparison of case
data of probable envenomation enhance understanding of whether and what other etiologies
may be involved.
Agelenidae Family
Tegenaria agrestis, or the Hobo spider, of the
Agelenidae family, came to the United States
from Europe in the early 1900s and was first collected in 1930 in Seattle, Washington (Exline,
1936). The species has become established in the
Pacific Northwest and bordering regions: Oregon,
Washington, Idaho, northern Utah, western
Montana, western Wyoming, Colorado (isolated
populations), and southern British Columbia(Vetter, Roe, et al., 2003). These regions do not overlap with the geographical regions endemic for spiders in the Loxosceles genus, though recently, as reported by Vetter (2005), a specimen of Loxosceles rufescens was submitted from Colorado.
Of the genus Cheiracanthium in the Agelenidae
family, rarely associated with dermal necrosis,
C. mildei and C. inclusum occur in the Pacific
Northwest, as well (Akre and Myhre, 1991). Yet,
Vest (1987b) has noted that Cheiracanthium spiders
were only rarely found in areas infested with T. agrestis spiders, and where necrotic a rachnidism had occurred, victims did not report painful bites, as are caused by Cheiracanthium spiders.
Symptoms of Probable T. agrestis (Hobo Spider)
Envenomation
Despite decades of cohabitation with T. agrestis,
only a few suspected bites between the 1980s
and 1990s have been documented, casting doubt
on the spider’s implication (Vetter & Isbister,
2004), though the bites generally occurred in or
around dwellings where T. agrestis spiders were
found (Fisher et al., 1994; Sadler, Force, Solbrig, & Sommer, 2001; U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, 1996; Vest, 1987b). Local
and systemic reactions typically include absence
of strong pain; formation of a skin inflammation,
with small central area of induration (a hardened mass or formation); and blistering at the bite site (15–35 hours post-bite). A day later, symptoms include sloughing of blistering skin
and serumal oozing, followed by eschar formation
(observed in dried lesions) and development of sub-scab necrosis (Fisher et al.; Vest, 1987b).
Local edema may occur (Akre & Myrhe, 1991; Vest, 1987b), and lesions may be oblong or elliptical
due to gravitational drift (Vest, 1987b).
The necrosis has been observed to be severe in
fatty areas, and healing has taken up to 2 or 3
years (Vest, 1993b).
Local reactions that diverge from the typical
course have been attributed to the T. agrestis
bite. These reactions include both local edema
spreading to the affected limb or part (Akre &
Myhre, 1991; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996) and delayed onset of edema (within weeks or months post-bite) (Akre & Myhre).
Systemic symptoms, such as headache, nausea,
influenza-like aches and pains (including
arthralgia), weakness, and dizziness/mental confusion, may occur on the day of the bite or on
the first or second day post-bite, possibly persisting for several days (Akre & Myhre, 1991;
Vest, 1987b). Fever has occurred during the days
following the bite (Akre & Myhre) and up to 7
days post-bite (U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, 1996).
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento